“Chick-fil-A vs. Moe’s Original Bar B Que: ‘Going Negative'” by Phillip Stutts

This is probably my favorite marketing concept to study, teach, and implement with clients — taking the political principle of “going negative” and utilizing it in business marketing.


Of course, I’m not talking about whacking your business competitors over the head like a negative political ad.


Instead, I encourage businesses owners to use comparative ad strategies and tactics that will offend no one (think: customers/clients) and grow your business.


While I believe it should be a business strategy, I want to highlight the EPIC nine-round slugfest between two competing businesses that used “going negative” tactically and collaboratively to earn hundreds of thousands of dollars in free advertising.


Entering the ring? Chick-fil-A and Moe’s Original Bar B Que.


If you haven’t already heard about this hilarious battle between two neighboring fast food chains, click here to read how they rolled with the punches — and even dragged a local strip club into their melee.


This story is so frickin’ brilliant!


So, why don’t more business owners use the same type of friendly comparative ad strategies and tactics? I believe their marketing agencies convince them to not “rock-the-boat” so the agency doesn’t have to think outside-the-box.


What a shame!


But there are 4 easy takeaways that you can learn from this story and how the top brands, like Pepsi, Apple, T-Mobile and even Wendy’s, are successfully executing their own “negative” ad campaigns…


. . .


Click here to read the full article on Medium.

[gravityform id="3" title="false" description="false"]